Inventory and status of zare systems at CoF

From dtype.org

Status as of 14 September 2026. All figures measured directly from both servers that day. Unlisted; not linked from anywhere.

The short version

CoF's video archive lives on two servers, zare4 and zare5: six storage volumes, about 166 TB of usable space.

  • All six volumes are online with full two-drive redundancy. No files have been lost.
  • Four drives have been replaced since late July: three on zshare5c and one on zshare5b. The latest swap was on 11 September. The rebuild finished that night and checked out clean.
  • The monthly integrity scan on 6 September read every volume end to end, and data and redundancy matched on all six. It turned up read errors on two drives in particular, and the RAID corrected every one. One of those two drives was replaced on 11 September. The other is being watched.
  • Two drives are being watched (below). Both are still in service, and a spare is on the shelf for each.
  • Three volumes are 100% full. Maintenance can't fix that; it needs new storage.
  • No failure is known right now. One routine item is open: a replacement 4 TB spare, requested from Jeannine on 11 September.

There is some urgency, though. These are 2012 and 2013 machines, well past any normal service life. Nothing is known to be failing today, but their age and the statistics for hardware this old say we are getting steadily closer to a failure we can't see coming, and one we won't recover from. RAID6 covers individual drive failures; it does not cover the machines themselves. Replacing drives keeps the archive alive for now, but it does not make the machines younger.

Volumes

Each volume is RAID6: eight drives, any two of which can fail without losing a file.

Server Share Built Drives Usable Used Status
zare4 zshare4a Aug 2012 8 × 3 TB 17 TB 100% Healthy, 8/8
zare4 zshare4b Aug 2012 8 × 3 TB 17 TB 95% Healthy, 8/8
zare4 zshare4c Apr 2015 8 × 6 TB 33 TB 100% Healthy, 8/8
zare5 zshare5a Jun 2013 8 × 4 TB 22 TB 93% Healthy, 8/8
zare5 zshare5b Jun 2013 8 × 4 TB 22 TB 85% Healthy, 8/8
zare5 zshare5c Apr 2017 8 × 10–12 TB 55 TB 100% Healthy, 8/8

Drives being watched

Share Drive (label serial) Age Current state Plan
zshare5c ZA20QMVH ~9 years (2017 original) 12,016 reallocated sectors: bad spots the drive has mapped out and worked around. Up 1,072 since August, a period that included the September scan. Unchanged since 11 September. No pending sectors. Replace if it fails. The 12 TB spare is held for it.
zshare4b WD-WCAWZ2253727 13.6 years (2012 original) Returned read errors during the September scan, all corrected by the RAID. No errors since. 61 pending sectors, unchanged since 7 September. Replace if it fails. The 3 TB spare is held for it.

Drives are replaced when they fail or show clear signs of failing, not when a counter merely rises. RAID6 plus a spare on the shelf is what makes that reasonable: a single drive failure costs a rebuild, not files.

Drive replacements since July 2026

Date Share What happened
24 Jul zshare5c A drive failed. Replaced with a 10 TB spare, and the volume rebuilt clean.
29 Jul zshare5c A drive with over 16,000 reallocated sectors was replaced before it could fail. Replaced with a 12 TB spare, and the volume rebuilt clean.
4 Aug zshare5c A drive that failed outright on 1 August was replaced with a 12 TB spare. The volume rebuilt clean by 5 August.
11 Sep zshare5b A drive failing reads in normal use was replaced with the 4 TB spare. The volume rebuilt clean the same night.

All four swaps were done by Jeannine, and each drive was identified correctly the first time.

Monitoring

  • Every drive on both machines runs its own health monitoring, which emails Drew if a drive reports unreadable sectors, errors or a failed self-test. Each data drive runs a short self-test every week.
  • The RAID emails Drew if a drive fails, and each machine sends a daily status email.
  • The integrity scan runs on the first Sunday of each month. The next one is 4 October.
  • Every drive's counters, and the RAID's own error counts, are reviewed by hand each month after the scan.
  • System logs from both machines are copied off-site. The configuration needed to rebuild either machine onto a new boot drive is kept on file.
  • Both machines had a security review in August and early September. Unused services were removed or switched off, and remote access was tightened.

Spares on hand

Size Qty For
20 TB 1 Earmarked for the Synology units
14 TB 1 Earmarked for the Synology units
12 TB 1 zshare5c
8 TB 1 Stand-in for any 3, 4 or 6 TB position
6 TB 2 zshare4c
4 TB 0 zshare5a / zshare5b. The last one was used on 11 September and a replacement has been requested. Until it arrives, the 8 TB can stand in.
3 TB 1 zshare4a / zshare4b

A larger drive can always replace a smaller one, because the volume uses only the space it needs. zshare5c already runs two 12 TB drives in 10 TB positions.

Complete drive inventory

Every drive in both machines, measured 14 September 2026. At least 22 of the 48 are the drives their volume was built with. The rest have been replaced over the years.

  • Age: how long the drive has been spinning, in years.
  • Realloc: bad spots the drive has mapped out. 0 is ideal. A small number that stays put is fine. A climbing number is the warning sign.
  • Pending: spots the drive suspects are bad but has not yet mapped out.

zare4

zshare4a (8 × 3 TB, built August 2012)

Serial Model Age Realloc Pending Note
WD-WMAWZ0265142 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WMAWZ0324492 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WMC4N0DDT38W WD30EZRX 4.9 0 0
WD-WCAWZ2344412 WD30EZRX 3.9 0 0
WD-WC81Y9051052 WD30EZRX 2.4 0 0
WD-WMAWZ0361626 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WMAWZ0408925 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0 A small number of read errors corrected by the RAID, date unknown. None since 11 September
WD-WMAWZ0342551 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0

zshare4b (8 × 3 TB, built August 2012)

Serial Model Age Realloc Pending Note
WD-WMAWZ0274013 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WMAWZ0198152 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WCAWZ2261213 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0
WD-WCAWZ2078646 WD30EZRX 2.7 0 1 Unchanged since July
WD-WCAWZ2253727 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 61 Watched (see above)
WD-WMC1T3071834 WD30EZRX 7.3 0 1 New 26 September
WD-WMAWZ0324385 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0 A small number of read errors corrected by the RAID, date unknown. None since 11 September
WD-WCAWZ2261050 WD30EZRX 13.6 0 0

zshare4c (8 × 6 TB, built April 2015)

Serial Model Age Realloc Pending
WD-C82DWNAK WD60EFZX 2.1 0 0
WD-WX22D24DM29Z WD60EFPX 0.4 0 0
WD-WX11DB4H8KNY WD60EFRX 2.6 0 0
WD-WX11D58LZ72R WD60EFRX 7.0 0 0
WD-WX21D48FD47L WD60EFRX 6.9 0 0
WD-WX51D89HDFEA WD60EFAX 4.8 0 0
WD-C80T9S3G WD60EFZX 4.0 0 0
WD-WX11D36JRUAF WD60EFRX 5.5 0 0

zare5

zshare5a (8 × 4 TB, built June 2013)

Serial Model Age Realloc Pending
ZDH0515X ST4000DM000 7.9 0 0
ZTT5XVJL ST4000DM004 2.3 0 0
W30066MR ST4000DM000 ~13.0* 0 0
ZDHAXA6M ST4000VN008 3.3 0 0
W3005NVH ST4000DM000 ~12.9* 0 0
S300LKHH ST4000DM000 1.6 0 0
ZFN5P3EV ST4000DM004 0.7 0 0
W3006K96 ST4000DM000 ~13.0* 0 0

zshare5b (8 × 4 TB, built June 2013)

Serial Model Age Realloc Pending Note
ZFN1MZA8 ST4000DM004 7.6 0 0
ZFN5T3N2 ST4000DM004 new 0 0 Installed 11 Sep 2026
W3005M66 ST4000DM000 ~12.9* 0 0
W3005QTA ST4000DM000 ~12.9* 0 0
ZFN5RQF0 ST4000DM004 0.4 0 0
WD-WCC4E6ZPE2R8 WD40EZRZ 9.5 0 0
W30058V3 ST4000DM000 ~12.9* 0 0
ZFN1KWTX ST4000DM004 6.8 0 0

\* These six drives' hour counters have reset, so their ages come from head-flying time instead.

zshare5c (8 × 10–12 TB, built April 2017)

Serial Model Size In service since Realloc Pending Note
ZA21214K ST10000VN0004 10 TB 2017 8 0 Unchanged since July
ZA210YA7 ST10000VN0004 10 TB 2017 8 0
ZA20CYVN ST10000VN0004 10 TB 24 Jul 2026 0 0
ZA20QMVH ST10000VN0004 10 TB 2017 12,016 0 Watched (see above)
ZA20V0V8 ST10000VN0004 10 TB 2017 0 0
ZZ30LAEV ST12000VN0008 12 TB 4 Aug 2026 0 0
ZA20TS1E ST10000VN0004 10 TB 2017 0 0
ZZ30LASR ST12000VN0008 12 TB 29 Jul 2026 0 0

The 2017 drives' hour counters have reset, so they are dated from the volume's April 2017 build.

Each machine also has a 60 GB SSD boot drive. It holds only the operating system, and both report healthy.

Capacity

zshare4a, zshare4c and zshare5c are 100% full; the other three are at 85–95%. That leaves no room to stage files during maintenance and no room for new recordings on those volumes. The volumes can't be expanded in place, and putting larger drives into machines this old would take years to gain any space.

The sensible path is new storage rather than more drives for these machines: a further Synology unit with modern 20–28 TB drives, built the same way as the newer storage already on site. That is a budgeting matter for CoF, and not one to leave open-ended: nothing is known to be failing, but every month on this hardware brings an unrecoverable failure closer. Until then, these machines are kept running and drives are replaced as they fail.

Thanks to Jeannine, whose work at the rack is the reason this archive is still healthy.